FIR against PVR’s DIRECTOR'S,PROMOTER'S for cheating, FORGERY.
The
Gurgaon Police has registered an FIR against PVR Cinemas, and its promoters and
directors on charges of cheating and forgery on the directions of the Gurgaon
civil court
The Gurgaon Police has registered an FIR against PVR Cinemas, and its
promoters and directors on charges of cheating and forgery on the directions of
the Gurgaon civil court. Its promoters Ajay Bijli, Sanjeev Kumar Bijli,
Niharika Bijli and eight other persons have been booked under relevent sections
of the IPC for selling stocks at inflated value of Rs 820 crore illegally and
causing loss to Gurgaon-based real estate companies. The FIR was registered at
the Sushant Lok phase-1 police station yesterday. The case came to light when
Elan Group filed a complaint in the court, which on November 17 directed the
local police to register an FIR against Chairman and Managing Director of PVR
Limited Ajay Bijli, and directors Niharika Bijli, Sanjeev Kumar Bijli and others.
PVR Limited had claimed they were going to have 1,000 screens by 2018,
according to the FIR.
“It entered into MOUs with builders of commercial space and Ajay Bijli
made sensational statements to the press that PVR was in the process of
achieving its target of 1,000 cinema screens by 2018, thereby inflating the
share prices of PVR based on false statements,” it read. “Once PVR sold its 14
per cent stakes by overpricing to Warbur Pincus, a US based fund, it
fraudulently and malafidely tried to terminate the MOU,” the FIR claimed. The
complainant found that PVR never had any intention of taking on lease the
multiplex proposed to be developed in terms of the aforesaid MOUs. Elan Group
found that “the accused had hatched a well- planned conspiracy with the malafide
intent to allure investors to increase the share value and worth of PVR in
global market. “Once the shares of PVR were sold, they dumped the
contracts/MoUs and fraudulently tried to terminate deals,” it alleged.
However, PVR in a statement termed the allegations “incorrect and
baseless” and said they were made with the sole intention to tarnish its image.
“In 2016, PVR was approached by Elan, offering multiplex space in certain
projects proposed to be constructed by Elan in Gurugram. The parties entered
into MoU based on several representations made by Elan. “PVR subsequently
discovered that Elan had misrepresented facts and was therefore constrained to
terminate the MOUs and a civil dispute is currently pending between the parties
inter alia in this regard,” it said. “PVR is seeking legal advice with regard
to the order passed by the judicial magistrate, Gurgaon and shall take
appropriate recourse under applicable laws. Since the aforesaid proceedings are
currently sub-judice, PVR is not in a position to provide any further comments
at this stage,” the statement read.
No comments:
Post a Comment